The Death of Reel-Based Machines? Gambling Commission’s Proposal Threatens Industry Classics
- SPIN RAIDER

- Sep 29, 2024
- 4 min read
Updated: Oct 5
The Death of Reel-Based Machines? In a shocking move that could forever change the face of gambling in the UK, the Gambling Commission has launched a proposal that may spell the end for reel-based legacy machines—the very heart and soul of the traditional gaming experience. These cherished machines, beloved by generations of players, could be outlawed under new Gaming Machine Technical Standards, forcing them off the market and putting countless independent operators at risk of closure.



A Threat to Tradition
For decades, reel-based machines—those classic three-reel wonders—have been the backbone of the gambling world. These timeless machines, with their iconic fruits, bells, and lucky sevens, represent more than just nostalgia. They are a vital part of the independent gaming sector, relied upon by small businesses and operators who simply cannot afford to upgrade to newer digital models. But that might not matter anymore.
The Gambling Commission is proposing changes that will require mandatory software updates, including features like enhanced limit settings, timeouts, and staff alerts. But here’s the catch: these updates are impossible for analog machines. In a brutal twist of irony, the very machines that have built the industry could be legislated out of existence simply because they lack the technology to comply.
A Crushing Blow for Independent Operators
The proposed standards, while aimed at curbing problem gambling, could deliver a fatal blow to small independent operators who depend on these legacy machines for their livelihood. Peter Hannibal, CEO of the Gambling Business Group, warns that these changes could mean the end for many operators:
“We are talking about an existential threat to small businesses and the heart of local communities. Forcing them to scrap their machines could wipe out a large portion of the industry.”
Many operators are already struggling to stay afloat in a fiercely competitive market. If these changes go through, hundreds of venues will face an impossible choice: invest in costly new machines, or shut down. John Bollom, President of Bacta, noted in a recent email to members:
"Operators could see their machines declared illegal overnight. The cost of upgrading is unfeasible for many independents—this could shut their doors permanently."
The Player Backlash
But it’s not just the businesses that will suffer—the players will, too. The Commission seems to have forgotten the golden rule of gambling: Know Your Customer. These reel-based machines aren’t just relics; they’re in-demand by countless players who seek a traditional, simpler gaming experience. These players aren’t flocking to the flashy digital slots—they want the authentic thrill of the old favorites.
Peter Hannibal points out:
"The idea that these machines are more harmful than newer digital models is completely unsupported by evidence. In fact, many of the players who favor legacy machines are long-standing customers who don’t fit the profile of problem gamblers."
So why is the Gambling Commission pushing this agenda? Why isn’t the voice of the consumer being heard? The Commission's silence on the issue of proportionality has raised eyebrows across the industry. Why destroy an entire sector of the market without concrete evidence that these machines pose a greater risk than modern alternatives?
A Growing Divide
The pre-consultation has only deepened the rift between the regulator and the industry. Senior stakeholders are outraged, accusing the Commission of turning a blind eye to the very real consequences of their proposals. Coinslot has fielded numerous calls from stakeholders who feel the Commission’s attitude is dismissive and out of touch with the realities faced by operators.
“The Gambling Commission’s obsession with updating standards overlooks a simple fact: these older machines work for players. They’re not obsolete—they’re loved,” Hannibal adds. “It’s absurd that we’re even having this conversation.”

The Fallout
The fallout from these proposed changes could be catastrophic. Thousands of jobs are at stake, particularly in the Adult Gaming Centres (AGCs) and smaller venues that rely heavily on their legacy offerings. If these businesses close, we could witness the death of high-street gaming as we know it, leaving a void in communities across the country.
Consumers will lose access to a range of products that they enjoy, while many venues will be forced to remove the very machines that draw their loyal customer base. For many independent operators, reel-based legacy machines are their lifeline, and without them, they face ruin.
A Call to Action
It’s clear that the Gambling Commission needs to take a step back and rethink this strategy. Forcing these changes onto an industry that has thrived on tradition, without any clear evidence of harm, could devastate both operators and players alike.
This is about more than just machines. It’s about preserving the soul of an industry and ensuring that small businesses, which are already struggling in the face of mounting pressures, aren’t crushed under the weight of regulations that don’t even apply to their analog machines.
As Peter Hannibal warns:
“If the Commission wants to see the end of small AGC operators, this measure will certainly do the trick.”
In the end, this isn’t just a fight for the legacy machines—it’s a fight for the future of the entire independent gambling industry.







As with the "cashless society" the real reason behind this is absolutely clear, every game recorded to a back-end server with duty charged per spin.
Great words Allan 🙌
It’s absolutely ridiculous, and how often do you see under 18’s even trying to play the likes of reel based fruits. It will be a shameful day if this passes and becomes the new law.
Mark
Well said Alan Frost your spot on
It’s about time real people from the gambling commission came down to these retro places to understand their functionality and their objectives.
Pen pushers will ultimately succumb to the hierarchy of the corporate puppeteers controlling the proceedings. Of all the places running fruit machines these are places that adhere to the rules and have the lowest rate of problem gambling. Mainly because most are enthusiasts that play for nostalgia and that market has grown up now and will spend what they can afford to spend.
Reel based games were the foundation of the industry back in the day where the government revenue was originally farmed. Why the change ?
It’s not to do with minors having gambling issues stemmed from…